AUMF: Another Way

The South Carolina Advocacy Team requests the following actions.  Senator Tim Scott’s birthday is  September 19th. That is on a Sunday, so please call his office on Friday 9/17. Tell the staff that you are a constituent and sending birthday best wishes, and ask that he request that SJ Res 10 come to a vote. The number is (202) 224-6121.  This is not a group call, but a call-in action.

Please remember that if you get an LTE published, the SC Advocacy Team would like to send it to FCNL and we can share it on the Columbia Friends  website. 

The South Carolina FCNL Advocacy Team is focused on repealing the Authorization for Military Force (AUMF) for Iraq so that military actions and assassinations cannot occur without the approval of Congress.   Please see the full text of the bill here:   https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/10/text .   The following letters to the Editors are in support of this effort.    

Carol’s Letter to Editor

I  know a lot of Americans are saddened by the recent tragedies in Afghanistan. Unfortunately we (the United States government) are responsible for much of the mess.

protesters in belarus
Photo by Artem Podrez on Pexels.com

One thing that could help prevent this from happening again is the passage of Senate Joint Resolution 10.

This bill targets 1991 and 2002 authorizations that allowed the president to use military force against Iraq..

Kudos to bill sponsor Sen.Tim Kaine,D.VA. I hope our congressional delegation gets on board with this legislation.  It’s time for peace and diplomacy not aggression or war.

https://www.postandcourier.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/letters-remembering-lucille-whipper-a-charleston-trailblazer/article_7897599c-f490-11eb-af7f-93223baab778.html

WESTINGHOUSE

No more than a 10 year license with strict conditions requiring good compliance
Testify at the webinar August 26th

(see instructions for participating here: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2122/ML21223A340.pdf)

Email comments to:

[email protected] before September 20, 2021

  1. The existing NRC license failed to prevent extensive radioactive and hazardous pollution by the Westinghouse Nuclear Fuel Fabrication Facility over the last 50 years which threatens air quality, groundwater and surface water quality including the waters of Mill Creek which flows through the site and into the Congaree River;
  2. Under the existing NRC license Westinghouse has failed to demonstrate the necessary corporate character or competence to comply with regulatory requirements.  A history of spills, leaks, accidents and corporate malfeasance undermine assurance that Westinghouse will comply with future regulatory requirements under a new 40 year license;
  3. Under the existing license the NRC has failed to exercise sufficient oversight to prevent and remedy pollution discharges and violations by Westinghouse;
  4. Only through action by the local State authorities- SCDHEC- as recently as 2019, did Westinghouse disclose extensive radioactive and toxic contamination of groundwater at the site and sediments at the bottom of Mill Creek which flows to the Congaree River. Such sediment contamination includes radioactive Uranium and Technetium 99. The sources of such pollution remain unidentified and  its extent and remediation remain incomplete.  No new license should be approved until such historic pollution has been cleaned up and full corrective action to prevent future pollution has been implemented;

5.  The NRC and Westinghouse have failed to comply with Environmental Justice regulatory requirements. While acknowledging that the Westinghouse Nuclear Fuel Fabrication Facility is sited in a predominately African American and low income residential community, with numerous additional sources of environmental hazard including an adjacent Superfund Hazardous Waste Site and the nearby Wateree coal-fired power plant, NRC and Westinghouse have failed to properly address the disproportionate and harmful impacts of future  facility operations on the Environmental Justice (EJ) community or poverty area, including the cumulative and synergistic impacts of other sources.  The NRC and Westinghouse have failed to properly assess the  heightened impacts of facility pollution on subsistence hunting and fishing by members of the impoverished community in areas adjacent to the facility boundaries. Over the last 50 years of facility operations the NRC and Westinghouse have failed to effectively engage the local community to facilitate effective understanding of facility operations and impacts and effective public participation in facility regulation. Hopkins is designated by Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) as a medically underserved area (MUA) and
medically underserved population (MUP). As such, it deserves better protection from additional health threats.

  1. WFFF agreed to an Intensive Archaeological Survey, conducted late summer/early fall 2021, with final SHPO approval anticipated circa February 2022. The NRC staff anticipates publishing the final EIS in January 2022, and the Record of Decision in February 2022. An assessment about the license cannot be made without the results of the Intensive Archaeological
    Survey. The Pine Hill Indian Tribe is originally from the area. An important Native American cemetery site (Green Hill Mound), thought to be ancestral to the Pine Hill, that is presently not protected under the federal Native American Grave Protections and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) law is in close proximity to WFFF. It is an Ancestral, generational heirloom to the Pine Hill Tribe. As such, its significance is priceless. The Area of Potential Effect of the new license
    should be increased to include this archaeological site. No new license should be approved without the results of the SHPO approved Intensive Archaeological Survey incorporated into theEIS.
  2. A historic African American cemetery, Denley Cemetery, thought to be potentially eligible to the National Register of Historic Places is located on the WFFF property. A test well has been installed in close proximity to the cemetery. Test wells should not be installed in such close proximity to significant archaeological resources.
  3. Westinghouse Government Services, LLC, a duly registered company with the SC secretary of state, appears to be operating under the same roof as the Westinghouse fuel fabrication facility, where uranium rods are fabricated for foreign and domestic nuclear power plants. Westinghouse Government Services, previously known as WesDyne, produces specialized rods
    that are irradiated to produce tritium gas for nuclear weapons. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission claims it does not regulate the facility and the SC Department of Health and Environmental Control says it has issued no permits to the facility and that waste goes to the fuel plant. It is unclear who is regulating the facility or what sort of contaminants it is generating.
    The tritium rod issue makes the Westinghouse plant a civilian-military “dual use” facility.

Rooftop Solar



The S.C. Public Service Commission has rejected a plan by
Dominion Energy that would have smacked solar energy users
with charges critics said would discourage the use of sun
power by homeowners seeking to save money.

Rooftop Solar Saved from the Brink in South Carolina

We WON a good-old-fashioned organizing victory against Dominion Energy South Carolina, a powerful investor owned utility (IOU) serving 750,000 electric customers from Columbia to Charleston. For all my fellow Sierrans fighting Investor Owned Utilities (IOUs) who actively want to END rooftop solar in your state, take heart. Their “subsidization” arguments can be used against them.

In a state where community solar is nearly nonexistent, a solar victory at last! The April 28, 2021 announcement that the SC Public Service Commission (PSC) unanimously rejected Dominion’s filed tariff/fee structure was surprising given the state’s recent Energy Freedom Act of 2019 which was refashioned by monopoly utilities to ensure there was no cost shift from non-solar customers to rooftop solar customer generators. On its face, we in the pro-solar camp don’t want “subsidies” either, but in reality the over-reaching tariff was designed to not only cool the booming rooftop solar industry, but drive it away completely by pricing interconnection out of reach for many families, the majority of whom selected rooftop solar as a way of dealing with the disproportionately high bills we pay in S. Carolina. (Duke and Dominion rooftop customers enjoy a progressive one-to-one net metering rate that has benefited families since becoming law in 2014). Dominion had inadvertently included in previous testimony that the actual cost shift amounted to pennies per meter. With this disclosure, their true motivation for the new fees became abundantly clear.

This decision is unprecedented in our state, and maybe our region as well. Our solar story showcases the importance of owning the narrative. Intervenors attribute this story about an urban farm having to scrap its solarization plans with news of the new fees (projected to burden the average family or small business with an extra $750 per year). Marrying food justice issues to energy justice issues proved too “juicy” for the media to resist. 

This is the third major decision from our NEW public service commission directed at Dominion within a year (the rate hike “pause,” the rejected integrated resource plan, and now this solar tariff). We began our organizing work with a strategy session in December, 2020 which culminated in a nighttime hearing on March 23, 2021 which we fought for and won (again, an unprecedented public request which was granted by the PSC only after Dominion tried to restrict the hearing to Dominion customers only even though it likely affected all South Carolinians.) We appreciate the new PSC putting the “public” back into the public service commission.

I would like to thank Ready for 100 and especially Drew O’Bryan and Rachel Dupree, who helped me get my nuanced argument together for an op-ed. Our team was anchored by longtime volunteer Pamela Greenlaw who went above and beyond by leafleting her solar neighbors even during a pandemic. Thanks to local Midlands group Sierra Club chair Priscilla Preston who carefully monitored the PSC hearings ALL day and adjusted her comments accordingly in conjunction with others so all our points were made. In a record-setting event, we had 260+ people testifying until 1:30 a.m. or later and another 191 submitting written comments! (For comparison’s sake, that is 2.5 times the number of testimonies delivered against Dominion’s unjustifiable rate hike case last year at the height of the pandemic). The PSC heard our arguments and voted unanimously to say NOPE to both Dominion’s proposal and S.C. Office of Regulatory Staff’s worse alternative! Dominion did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Cost shift narratives like the one used by Dominion are some of the hardest to beat when going up against investor owned utilities. It’s an oldie but a goody, frequently utilized by IOUs all over the country. The good news is if we can beat the IOUs here, we can beat them anywhere!

A few Media Hits:

Solar boosters stop utility’s plans to hike bills for sun power customers in SC (The State, Columbia via MSN)

SC Regulators deny Dominion’s rate plan for future rooftop solar customers (Charleston Post & Courier)

Solar Choice Metering: A Better Way (Duke vs. Dominion) – A blog post by SACE showcases why the enormous turnout was needed for Dominion’s docket, but not Duke’s docket.

South Carolina regulators save net metering, reject Dominion’s proposalSouth Carolina PSC rejects Dominion solar plan, preserves net metering